I did them all well yaaaayyy! On another note, a friend and I argue about whether it was normal to start a sentence with “I am” instead of “I am.” Their argument is that the only acceptable subject for “am” is “me”; then the omission of the subject should not affect the sentence, because it can only have one meaning. An argument that she supports by referring to foreign languages such as Spanish or French, where one can use the correct form of the verb without the subject, for example Yo soy professora or soy professora. Both expressions mean that I am a teacher. What do you think? I got them, but I knew what I was looking for! I think people stumble a lot in the language, but when they write, they should take the time to think about it a little more. In the UK at least, the word public, such as family or team, can be considered plural, so they use a plural verb. Before, it irritated me when I lived there. Now that we communicate so often on a global scale, I see that different uses are spreading among all English speakers. Maybe one day, in the United States, we will add that you are for color, honor and favor! A pluralistic collective name accepts a plural verblage: families appreciate this restaurant. The key to concordance of subjects and verbs is to recognize the simple subject. But if we consider the group as an impersonal entity, we use singular verbs (and singular pronouns): explanation of the error: Board is a singular subject; it takes a singular verb, meeting: the board of directors meets every month. I have a question on the fifth sentence. I thought the verb “settle” would be in the past, because “Testing showed this” shows that the action took place in the past.
The correspondence between the subject and the verb may seem simple to native speakers and others who know English. We know how to write “the lawyer argues” and “the lawyers argue”. However, certain special circumstances can make it more difficult to tell if a subject and verb really match. These complications can arise from the words themselves or from their order in a given sentence. Note that some collective names always adopt plural obstructions. Some examples: Although “Son” adopts a plural verblage under normal circumstances, the author has understood in this case that “Son of the Revolution” is a proper noun that refers to an organization as a whole, and not to several specific threads. In such cases, the verb may be singular or plural, but must correspond to the next part of the subject. Your ear can guide you here; The “accused want” and the “accused want” sound fake, regardless of the subject with which they might be paired.
Here`s a complex topic with the simple topic in bold: Collective names are those that give a name to a group of other names, for example. B to a board of directors. These can also make it difficult to arrange the verb, because the collective noun is singular and what it calls the plural. Lately, the most common mistake I see in writing samples from intelligent and successful people is a lack of subject-verb consistency. Humans use singulate scars with plural subjects and plural offal with singular subjects. There are mistakes everywhere. Suze, I agree that some of these sentences need to be thoroughly examined. If they were easier to write, we wouldn`t have to worry so much about the subject-verb agreement. But there are some cases where a singular collective noun actually expresses a plural idea and needs a plural verbage.
. . .